Millennials Are More Likely To Pay For Your Content

As the axiom goes, necessity is the mother of invention. In today's economy, that old saying has evolved: The current recession is the mother of innovation, according to Lindsay Schutte,Director of Frank N. Magid Associate's Generational Strategy Program. Media, in an effort to stop the bloodletting, is innovating straight into the pre-Internet era. The latest trend is trying to convince consumers to pay for the content they currently get online for free. Surprisingly, research conducted by Frank N. Magid Associates in June indicates that consumers are willing to pay for access to the content they enjoy. In fact, members of Gen Y are more likely to say they will spend money than Gen Xers and Baby Boomers. By most expert counts, Baby Boomers control most of the wealth in the United States. However, their attitudes towards paying for content reveal a less than ideal product target. Across every category tested, Baby Boomers were less likely than Gen Yers to say they would pay for content. For instance, 80% of Gen Yers say they would pay for music, whereas only 52% of Baby Boomers say the same. Sixty-nine percent of Gen Yers would pay for professionally produced television programming, whereas only 51% of Baby Boomers say the same. The gap narrows when it comes to news and information, 43% of Gen Yers say they would pay versus 36% of Baby Boomers -- but the gap still exists. Paying is defined as exchanging money; it does not include accepting ads for content. If charging for content is the goal, then it is imperative that Gen Yers have a seat at the table. The challenge is not in whether they will pay, but what Gen Y will pay for. There are several ways to approach the challenge. One is to put walls around your content and hope it is desired enough to warrant payment. Another approach is to evolve a current or future product into a brand that Gen Yers find indispensable. We know that Gen Yers are cost conscious, but we also know they will pay a premium if they see a concrete benefit. The product or service must solve a problem, provide exclusive access to content, or emphasizes a custom user experience. Gen Y influence is only growing -- by the end of this year they will comprise 47% of the 18-49 advertising demographic, whereas Baby Boomers will only comprise 17% of the 18-49 demo. As we ride the Gen Y wave, even more money-making opportunities are revealed. The evolution will not be easy, but it will be worth it -- just make sure you factor Gen Ys into the plan.

Court Throws Out FCC Cable Ownership Limit

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A U.S. appeals threw out a regulation that has limited cable companies to serving up to 30 percent of the country's subscription television market, a big victory for operators like Comcast Corp and Cablevision Corp. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that the Federal Communications Commission's rule, adopted in late 2007, was arbitrary and capricious and vacated it. The regulation was first set in 1993 but has been repeatedly challenged. "The commission has failed to demonstrate that allowing a cable operator to serve more than 30 percent of all cable subscribers would threaten to reduce either competition or diversity in programing," the court said. The judges pointed to rising competition among video providers, including satellite companies like DirecTV Group Inc as well as telephone companies like AT&T Inc and Verizon Communications Inc, which have been rolling out their own subscription television services. "Cable operators, therefore, no longer have the bottleneck power over programing that concerned the Congress in 1992." the court said. The FCC's cable ownership limit has been the focus of court challenges for years. The latest ruling presents a major challenge for new FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, a Democrat, who will now have to decide whether to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court, try to start from scratch, or abandon the regulation altogether.